Legal Opinion

Bird v. Rothstein

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1996No. 96-0910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpector, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT, ENOCH, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices, join.

In this original proceeding, Phil Bird seeks mandamus relief to require that his name be placed on the ballot as the Democratic nominee for state representative in House District 108. The issue is whether Bird is entitled to relief in light of our recent opinion in Davis v. Taylor, 930 S.W.2d 581 (Tex.1996). We conditionally grant in part the requested writ of mandamus.

The Honorable John Carona, the incumbent state representative for District 108, was the Republican nominee for the position when he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sterling v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Davis v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. LaRouche v. HannahTexas Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. in Re F.N. Williams, Sr., and Jared WoodfillTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In Re PalomoTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bird v. RothsteinTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re DoeTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re DoeTexas Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API