In re Hunter-Rand Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Hunter-Rand Company, bankrupt. On petition by Armstrong, Cator & Co. to review the referee’s findings of fact and law on a petition to recover possession of goods alleged to have been procured by the bankrupt by fraud.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
The referee found the following essential facts:
On several dates between March 28, 1916, and April 25, 1916, inclusive, the bankrupt, a’ mercantile corporation,, conducting its business in Raleigh, N. C., ordered and received from petitioners, Armstrong, Cator & Co., wholesale merchants conducting business in the city of Baltimore, Md., goods and merchandise invoiced at the aggregate sum of $697.18. The goods were sold upon the usual terms in regard to credit, prevailing in the trade. The largest .invoice amounted to $299.15, April 18, 1916, and the smallest $3.60,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jordan v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Lee v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Donaldson, Assignee v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gillespie v. J. C. Piles & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Des Farges v. . PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Kelley-How-Thomson Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- City of Southport v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1923
- In Re P. H. Krauss & Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924