Legal Opinion

Chen v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 15, 2005No. 04-2591PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Cai Xing Chen, a native and citizen of China, was denied asylum and ordered removed but did not seek judicial review of that determination. Instead, he filed two motions to reopen with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), each of which was denied. He now seeks review of the denial of his second motion' to reopen, which was premised on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the original asylum proceeding. .

The BIA denied the second motion on the basis that (1) Chen had waived the ineffective assistance issue because he had not raised it in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benitez-Pons v. The CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Jobe v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Canaveral Toban v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Opere v. INSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. Maindrond v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boakai v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. Dolores Tapia-Martinez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Dawoud v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Renaut v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Estrada-Canales v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API