State v. Monteleone
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Defendant consented to a search of his apartment by armed police officers after they entered his apartment without a search warrant in the early morning hours while he was sleeping. During their search, the police discovered evidence of a methamphetamine lab. We hold that there was insufficient attenuation between the officers’ illegal entry into Defendant’s apartment and his consent. As a result, Defendant’s consent was the fruit of a poisonous tree, and the evidence the police discovered during the ensuing search should have been suppressed. We therefore reverse the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. NyceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FigueroaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.