Legal Opinion
BEASLEY v. HOWARD
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 9, 2020No. 1:19-cv-11058Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DAVID BEASLEY, 1:19-cv-11058-NLH-KMW Plaintiff, OPINION v. WILLIAM H. HOWARD, Defendant. APPEARANCES: DAVID BEASLEY 1105 MACARTHUR DRIVE CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY 08104 PRO SE FRANK NATOLI NATOLI-LEGAL LLC 305 BROADWAY, 7th FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007 On behalf of Defendant HILLMAN, District Judge BACKGROUND This case stems from Plaintiff David Beasley’s allegation that Defendant William Howard violated the Lanham Act when he obtained a Federal Registration for his trademark “THE EBONYS” on July 10, 2012. Beasley alleges that he was the original…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.