Legal Opinion

United States v. Cardoza

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 23, 2015No. 13-2145PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Anthony Cardoza entered a guilty plea on a drug trafficking offense and received a sentence of 72 months at a sentencing hearing oh September 17, 2013. Cardoza raises an ineffective assistance of counsel claim challenging his conviction. Cardoza also contends that his case should be immediately remanded for resentencing because of a recent retroactive amendment to the sentencing guidelines.

Cardoza’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim asserts a number of alleged errors his lawyer committed. But this claim, as is often the case with such claims, involves fact-specific issues ill-suited for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ofray-CamposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Maldonado-RiosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerry BurnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. George, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. Bernardo Mendia v. John GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Rodríguez-MiliánCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Marin-EcheverriCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API