Legal Opinion

Thorp v. Preston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. Garnishment. The garnishees bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Thorp and Yogel were 'summoned as garnishees in a suit in favor of David Preston and John L. Harper against Edward A. Elliott. Each of them was shown to be a tenant of Elliott, under leases to run for sometime thereafter. All rent was paid which had accrued up to the time of garnishment. A receiver was appointed to receive the rents, and ultimately these were made the basis of a judgment against each garnishee.

The statute declares that no person shall be adjudged a garnishee “ by reason of any money or other thing due from him to the principal defendant, unless it be at the time of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martz v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Calechman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Barkley v. KerfootWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Erb-Kidder, Co. v. LevyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Walker v. Paramount Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  5. Dowling v. Lancashire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API