Stasiof v. Chicago Hoist & Body Co., Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bryant
This is an appeal under section 76(1) of the Civil Practice Act (Ill Rev Stats e 110, § 76.1) from a judgment entered on a jury verdict on May 8, 1962, finding in favor of the plaintiff, John Little, in the amount of $35,000 and in favor of the plaintiff, Carl Stasiof, in the amount of $10,000 and against the defendants Chicago Hoist & Body Co., Inc., and Domenick Palmieri, Two errors are assigned for reversal: 1. that during the cross-examination of the defendant Palmieri, plaintiffs’ attorney posed a prejudicial unfounded question which was not later tied up and which, although stricken…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Daniels v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Harper v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Smith v. Illinois Valley Ice Cream Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Arsnow v. Red Top Cab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Patton v. BickfordKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Hickey v. ZezulkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Sheila Watters, Individually and as Administratrix, Estate of Johnny Burnett, Deceased v. Tsr, Inc., A/K/A Tsr Hobbies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Rose Cleveland, Individually and in Her Capacity as of the Estate of Robert Cleveland, Esquire, Deceased v. Michael RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Repinski v. Jubilee Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.