Legal Opinion

Stasiof v. Chicago Hoist & Body Co., Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1964No. Gen. 49,017PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bryant

This is an appeal under section 76(1) of the Civil Practice Act (Ill Rev Stats e 110, § 76.1) from a judgment entered on a jury verdict on May 8, 1962, finding in favor of the plaintiff, John Little, in the amount of $35,000 and in favor of the plaintiff, Carl Stasiof, in the amount of $10,000 and against the defendants Chicago Hoist & Body Co., Inc., and Domenick Palmieri, Two errors are assigned for reversal: 1. that during the cross-examination of the defendant Palmieri, plaintiffs’ attorney posed a prejudicial unfounded question which was not later tied up and which, although stricken…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Daniels v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Harper v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Smith v. Illinois Valley Ice Cream Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  5. Arsnow v. Red Top Cab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Patton v. BickfordKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hickey v. ZezulkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sheila Watters, Individually and as Administratrix, Estate of Johnny Burnett, Deceased v. Tsr, Inc., A/K/A Tsr Hobbies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Rose Cleveland, Individually and in Her Capacity as of the Estate of Robert Cleveland, Esquire, Deceased v. Michael RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Repinski v. Jubilee Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API