Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gerson v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1961No. Civ. 24972Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ASHBURN, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I agree with most of the prevailing opinion but am unable to concur in an annulment of the award or in the reasoning which leads to that conclusion.

The majority opinion concedes that Blue Cross is entitled to a lien upon the compensation award, but holds that the commission’s erroneous denial of the lien precludes it as a matter of jurisdiction from ordering payment directly to Blue Cross because of the limited phraseology of section 4904, Labor Code •.“... The commission may order the amount of any lien claim, as determined and allowed by it, to be paid…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bankers Indemnity Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API