Legal Opinion

Gold Hunter Mining & Smelting Co. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1916No. 2667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Idaho; Erank S. Dietrich, Judge. Action by Edward Johnson against the Gold Hunter Mining & Smelting Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Edward Johnson, defendant in error here, but who, for convenience, will be called the plaintiff, recovered verdict and judgment against the Gold Hunter Mining '& Smelting Company, plaintiff in error here, but who will be called the defendant, for injuries received while he was working in the defendant’s mine in Shoshone county, Idaho, on October 17, 1914. Writ of error is brought by the defendant company.

Plaintiff was a machine man on the night shift on the 400-foot level of the mine. He alleged that, finding his drill out of repair, it became his duty to take the drill to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Palmer v. Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API