Legal Opinion
DiPace v. Goord
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 2004No. 02Civ.5418(WHP)(GWG)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
On January 29, 2004, Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein issued a report and recommendation (“report”) describing why this Court should deny plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). As of this date neither party has submitted any objection to the report nor requested an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, the Court finds that the report is not facially erroneous, and affirms and adopts it. Therefore, plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint is denied.
SO ORDERED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GORENST…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Summit Health, Inc. v. APS Healthcare Bethesda, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States ex rel. Raffington v. Bon Secours Health Sys., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Burns v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Cano v. DPNY, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Arnold v. Research Foundation for the State University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.