State v. LG Electronics, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGordon McCloud, J.
¶26 (concurring in part and dissenting in part) — The Washington State attorney general filed this parens patriae action on May 1, 2012, over 17 years after the alleged CRT5 price-fixing conspiracy began and over four years after he learned about it. Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 2, 26, 32 n.1, 58. He filed it for the benefit of certain private parties: the millions of Washington residents who indirectly purchased products (like televisions) with CRT components inside. The complaint also references a handful of residents who directly purchased CRTs unincorporated into a useable consumer product. CP…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.