STATE DEPT. OF FIN. AND ADMIN. v. Staton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentDavid Newbern, Justice
The petition for rehearing filed by the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) in this case does little more than reargue the points as they were argued in DFA’s original brief. Those points were fully aired in the original majority and dissenting opinions. (The original majority opinion appears as an appendix to this dissenting opinion.) The petition for rehearing, therefore, is distinctly violative of Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of the State of Arkansas 2-3(f), and it should be denied summarily. Not only does the majority ignore our established rule on that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Hercules Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Thorn v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- STATE DEPT. OF FIN. AND ADMIN. v. StatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996