Legal Opinion
Thorne v. Johnson
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1972No. 25655PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
The sole issue presented on this consolidated appeal is whether the causes of action pleaded against Douglass-Stewart Abstract & Investment Company (hereinafter referred to as “the Abstract Company”) are barred by limitations. The decision from which the appeals herein are taken was the sustaining of a motion by the Abstract Company for judgment on the plead ings. Consequently, the facts pleaded by the appellants must be taken as true. Although the issue presented is narrow, the situation involved is somewhat complicated.
Prior to March 27, 1957, Mr. and Mrs. L. Gayle…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Chemical Workers Basic Union Local No. 1744 v. Arnold Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Bank of Hartford County v. WatermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Rippe v. SutterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Dixon v. ShaftonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.