Legal Opinion
State v. Muth
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 2014No. 13-KA-1003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge.
| ¡¿Defendant, Carlo Muth, appeals his sentence for failing to comply with the registration requirements as a convicted sex offender. For the reasons that follow, we affirm defendant’s sentence and remand the matter to the trial court for correction of an error patent noted herein.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 28, 2013, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging defendant, Carlo Muth, with failure to maintain his sex offender registration by failing to provide community notification, in violation of La. R.S. 15:542. On May 3, 2013,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Roland v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. IsaacLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. MoutonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014