Khalaf v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission
1Opinion of the Court
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Gillen and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Gillen with modification regarding compensation for medical treatment.
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Brown v. Family Dollar Distribution CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- English v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.