Legal Opinion

Drexel v. Daniels

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1896No. 6675PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was an action to recover upon an alleged order by the defendants requesting plaintiffs to manufacture and *100ship to defendants a quantity of slippers. There was a trial to a jury, with verdict and judgment for plaintiffs for the full amount claimed in the petition. Defendants have removed the cause into this court, assigning nineteen grounds for reversal, only three of which are relied on in the brief filed, and the others will not be considered. The assignments argued are:

1. The verdict is contrary to law.

2. Verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

3. Error in the assessment in the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roff Oil & Cotton Co v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Cowperthwait v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API