Roff Oil & Cotton Co v. Winn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; A. T. West. Judge. Action by the Roff Oil & Cotton Company against U. G. Winn. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
This case presents error'from the district court of Pontotoc county. Plaintiff in error brought action as plaintiff against the defendant to recover on a promissory note for $343.62. The defendant for his answer averred payment of $100, and pleaded a counterclaim of $750 for damages growing out of the transaction out of which the note arose and a set-off of $440 for attorney’s fees. The ease was tried to a jury, and resulted in a verdict for defendant in the sum of $500. Whereupon a remit-titwr was entered for $343.62, and judgment was entered in the sum of $156.38. A motion for new trial was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Boyd v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Kuhl v. Supreme Lodge Select Knights & LadiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- McMaster v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Wade v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lowe v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 97Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. ChappelleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- MacKey v. NickollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. IsenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- First Nat. Bank of Temple v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.