Legal Opinion

State v. Kazee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1988No. 87-0844-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The State of Wisconsin (State) seeks review, requesting that this court clarify trial court duties when faced with a last-minute request to discharge counsel. In addition, we are asked to determine the appropriate remedy when the trial court fails to inquire about such a request. We determine that Terry Craig Kazee’s (Kazee) words "I don’t want him,” made during his counsel’s opening statement, was tantamount to a request for new counsel. Because no inquiry was made into Kazee’s request for new counsel, and we cannot discern from the record whether Kazee’s request had a substantial factual…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. United States v. Welty, John JacobCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Ben Lee Brown v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. McDowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. WantaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. State v. LomaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wingate v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API