Crissen v. Gupta
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Banco Popular North America’s {“Banco Popular”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b). [Dkt. 135.]
I
The Amended Complaint Allegations
A. The Parties
Plaintiff Joshua Crissen is an individual residing in Bloomfield, Indiana. [Dkt. 85 at 3, ¶ 7.] Defendants Vinod Gupta and Satyabala Gupta are husband and wife, and reside in Boca Raton, Florida. [Id. at 3, ¶¶ 8 — 9.] Mr. and Ms. Gupta are the only directors and officers of Wiper Corporation…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCants v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Parm v. National Bank of California, N.A.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Cisneros ex rel. Situated v. Petland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- Accord v. Anderson County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Ewalt v. Gatehouse Media Ohio Holdings II, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021