Legal Opinion

Advanced Countertop Design, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1999No. 33660PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges the district court’s refusal to dismiss an intentional tort claim against petitioner. By order entered February 4, 1999, we stayed the underlying proceedings and called for an answer. Having reviewed the petition and answer, we conclude our intervention in this matter by way of extraordinary relief is warranted.

The facts in the underlying case are not in dispute. Real party in interest Nathaniel Tenney was injured on April 1, 1996, his first day at work for petitioner Advanced Countertop Design (ACD). As a result…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tucker v. Action Equipment & Scaffold Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sterling Builders, Inc. v. FuhrmanNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. First Nat. Bank of Nev. v. EIGHTH JUDUCIAL DIST. COURTNevada Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. MilkoNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Zurbriggen v. Twin Hill Acquisition Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Conway v. Circus Circus Casinos, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API