Legal Opinion

Latham v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1972No. 46795PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

267 So.2d 895 (1972)

P.U. "Jack" LATHAM, d/b/a Latham Oil Company

v.

UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY.

No. 46795.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

October 23, 1972.

W.T. Denman, III, Eupora, for appellant.

Brooks, Guyton & Shaw, Kosciusko, for appellee.

INZER, Justice:

The principal question to be decided in this case is whether the parties to a fidelity bond, or a fidelity insurance contract, can legally contract so as to provide for a shorter period of limitation than prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations. We hold that Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated, Section 724 (1956), prohibits…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. DyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Stuyvesant Ins. v. A. C. Smith Motor Sales Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Standard Accident Insurance v. BroomMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Webster v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brander v. NaborsDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1978
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Lawler v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API