Legal Opinion
Bell v. Proctor
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 9, 1956No. 19209PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
Mrs. Mary Proctor instituted a suit for the recovery of damages against her stepbrother, David Bell, because of personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent driving by her husband of an automobile belonging to Bell, in which the latter was a passenger. She recovered a verdict, the defendant’s amended motion for a new trial was denied, and that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Bell v. Proctor, 92 Ga. App. 759 (90 S. E. 2d 84). We granted the defendant’s petition for the writ of certiorari.
Error is assigned on the ruling of the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Detwiler v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Amis v. CameronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Armstrong v. BallewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Laramore v. MinishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Penny v. VincentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lambert v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Young v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Cochran v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Wilson v. Professional Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Morrison v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.