Legal Opinion

Button v. Granberg

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1919No. File No. 4357Published

Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County. Ho,n. Alva E. Taylor, Judge. Action by May Button, against E. J. Granburg, and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company} upon a retail dealer’s bond, to recover damages resulting from the sale of intoxicating liquors to plaintiff’s husband. From a judgment for' plaintiff, and ■from an- order denying a new trial,-defendants appeal..

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

Action upon the bond of a retail dealer in intoxicating liquor executed Juñe 25, 1915. The plaintiff -brought this action on behalf of herself and minor child, alleging, among 'other things, that she was the widow of one Albert G. Button, that her said husband died February 26, 1916, caused by the excessive drinking of intoxicating liquors sold by defendant, and that her husband was at the time of such sales an intoxicated person and a person in the habit of getting intoxicated.

In section 2839, Rev. Pol. Code 1903, some of the required conditions of such bond were that the principal would not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garrigan v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Palmer v. SchurzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Daudel v. WolfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Dickmann v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Campbell v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API