Legal Opinion
Delarosa v. Boiron, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 25, 2011No. 2:10-cv-01569PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gina Delarosa, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed this action in California state court, alleging that Defendant Boiron, Inc. 1 defrauded Californians by claiming that a tablet called “Children’s Coldcalm” would provide relief from sneezing, runny nose, nasal congestion, sinus pain, headaches, and sore throat. (Doc. 1, Ex. 2.) Defendant removed the case pursuant to diversity as set forth under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), and pursuant to the Class Action…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Eckler v. Neutrogena Corp. CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lewert v. Boiron, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Alliance for Natural Health USA v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Bojko v. Pierre Fabre USA Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.