Legal Opinion

United States v. William Bell

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 17, 2016No. 14-3462, 14-3470PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted William Bell and Lenard Dixon of first-degree murder and being an accessory after the fact to the murder, respectively, in the death of a fellow inmate at the federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana. Each appeals the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction: Bell contends in particular that the evidence is insufficient to establish that he premeditated the murder, and Dixon contends that the evidence is insufficient to establish that he aided Bell with the intent to prevent Bell from being held to account for the murder. Bell…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Deandre CherryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Tina Jimerson v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Mohammad KhanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Maus v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Anthony Bender, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API