Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burk v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1964No. 19,889Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Faulconer, C. J.

I cannot agree with my learned colleagues that this case cannot be decided on the merits. I feel that the reasons, given by the majority opinion for holding that appellant has failed to meet the burden required of her in her brief áre - too vague and too general to specifically combat.

*639A reading of the briefs of both parties readily evidences that the only real issue in this appeal is the granting, by the trial court, of a judgment for appellee on answers of the jury to interrogatories, notwithstanding the general verdict for appellant. It is also clear that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Jones v. CaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Larkins v. KohlmeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. New York Central Railroad Co. v. GladIndiana Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API