Burk v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Faulconer, C. J.
I cannot agree with my learned colleagues that this case cannot be decided on the merits. I feel that the reasons, given by the majority opinion for holding that appellant has failed to meet the burden required of her in her brief áre - too vague and too general to specifically combat.
*639A reading of the briefs of both parties readily evidences that the only real issue in this appeal is the granting, by the trial court, of a judgment for appellee on answers of the jury to interrogatories, notwithstanding the general verdict for appellant. It is also clear that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Jones v. CaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Larkins v. KohlmeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. GladIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.