Miller v. Carlson
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are a class of California recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) who require child care in order to participate in educational or training activities likely to assist them in securing employment and ultimately removing themselves from welfare. In a Memorandum and Order dated June 7,1991 (“Memorandum and Order”), 768 F.Supp. 1331, this Court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the California Department of Social Services (“DSS”) from failing to provide continued child care assistance to California recipients…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. LOPEZ Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hurley v. ToiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Miller v. CarlsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaiser v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1991
- Saldate v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- (HC) George v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010