Legal Opinion

Miller v. Carlson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 25, 1991No. C-91-0676 SAWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEIGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are a class of California recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) who require child care in order to participate in educational or training activities likely to assist them in securing employment and ultimately removing themselves from welfare. In a Memorandum and Order dated June 7,1991 (“Memorandum and Order”), 768 F.Supp. 1331, this Court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the California Department of Social Services (“DSS”) from failing to provide continued child care assistance to California recipients…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. LOPEZ Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Hurley v. ToiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  5. Miller v. CarlsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1991
  2. Saldate v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  3. (HC) George v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API