Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barker

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 7, 2017No. Case No. 114,851PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH, VICE-CHIEF JUDGE:

¶ 1 Plaintiff, Mindy Michelle Smith, appeals from an adverse verdict in a personal injury action resulting from an automobile-bicycle collision at the intersection of South 109th East Avenue and East 71st Street in Tulsa. The jury found that Plaintiff was 80% at fault for her own injury and that Defendant, Tiffany Angel Barker, the driver of the pick-up truck that hit Plaintiff, was 20% at fault.

¶ 2 In this appeal, Plaintiff criticizes the court's failure to give the negligence per se instructions she submitted. Plaintiff claims that as a result the jury…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Dutsch v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. CHARTNEY v. CITY OF CHOCTAWCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
  2. Chartney v. City of ChoctawCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
  3. Armstrong v. Health Care Service CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
  4. Bird v. Millis Limitless Transportation LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  5. Conway v. Lone Star Transportation, LLC.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API