Legal Opinion

Kloppenburg v. Mays

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1939No. 6554PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AILSHIE, C. J. —

This is an appeal from a judgment of rescission of a contract of sale and purchase of a mining claim.

Respondent, a bachelor, native of Boise county, had resided in Boise basin for more than seventy years. He had engaged in all kinds of mining and was the owner of the Golconda, a quartz mining claim located in the Moore’s Creek Mining District, and also owned a half interest in two other mining claims, the Golconda No. 2 and the Nevada. Respondent knew appellant Howes all his life and had known Greene for eight or ten years. Howes was the owner of some placer claims below the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. White v. . KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Breshears v. CallenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Settle v. WintersIdaho Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McPheters v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lindberg v. RosethIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. April Beguesse, Inc. v. Kenneth RammellIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Irwin Rogers Insurance Agency, Inc. v. MurphyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Thomas v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API