Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Capitol Vending Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1964No. 31223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner. ’

Pursuant to Civil Rule 82.13, V.A.M.R., the parties filed a statement of the case, approved by the trial court, as the transcript on appeal. It appears from the statement that on September 13, 1960, an information was filed in the Municipal Court of St. Louis wherein Capitol Vending Company was charged with having sold or offered for sale packaged cigarettes without hav*520ing affixed thereto the required City cigarette tax stamp, in violation of Sections 64 and 73 of Ordinance 46432. Defendant through its attorney pleaded not guilty, was tried and fined, and duly appealed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. State v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State v. LintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. City of St. Louis v. VetterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KestersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. Kansas City v. StricklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Harris v. LaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. State v. GoochSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. City of St. Louis v. GoldmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API