Legal Opinion
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 13,643 Mary D. Hartnett Joseph P. Hartnett v. Schering Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1993No. 92-2422PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEORGE ROSS ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge:
Mary and Joseph Hartnett appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in their product liability action against Schering Corporation, a manufacturer of the drug Dienestrol (DEN). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Schering, having found as a matter of law that the Hartnetts failed to bring their action within the three year period mandated by the Maryland statute of limitations governing civil actions. 806 F.Supp. 1231. We affirm.
FACTS
In February 1960, Kathleen Dwyer, pregnant with the plaintiff, Mary Hartnett,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennwalt Corp. v. NasiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Crystal R. Jackson v. Randy Kimel at & T Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Anne Needham v. White Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Ferrigno v. Eli Lilly and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Jeandron v. Board of Regents of the University System of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Fischer v. Viacom International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Helinski v. Appleton PapersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.