State v. Marcolini
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KLEIN, Judge.
The appellee was charged with theft of electricity as a result of the discovery of a wire having been inserted in a hole which had been drilled in his electric meter. The statute under which he is charged provides that these facts constitute prima facie evidence of a violation of the statute, and the county court held this provision unconstitutional under the principle that the provision so restricts a fact-finder’s freedom to determine whether the evidence reflects guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as to amount to a denial of due process. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marcolini v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- State v. AcostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995