Legal Opinion

State v. Marcolini

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1995No. 93-3825PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Judge.

The appellee was charged with theft of electricity as a result of the discovery of a wire having been inserted in a hole which had been drilled in his electric meter. The statute under which he is charged provides that these facts constitute prima facie evidence of a violation of the statute, and the county court held this provision unconstitutional under the principle that the provision so restricts a fact-finder’s freedom to determine whether the evidence reflects guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as to amount to a denial of due process. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marcolini v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. State v. AcostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API