Legal Opinion

Spivey v. Neitlich

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 27, 2003No. 01-P-767PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRapoza, J.

The defendant, David E. Neitlich, appeals from the dismissal of his appeal by a judge of the Probate and Family Court, for failure to comply with the appeals clerk’s requests for his assistance in assembling the record, as required under Mass.R.A.P. 9(c)(1), as amended, 378 Mass. 936 (1979). The underlying appeal was from a judgment removing the defendant from his position as trustee of a trust under the will of Elizabeth S. Tasney. In view of the defendant’s inaction in the face of repeated directives from the appeals clerk for the Probate Court, we conclude that the appeal was properly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vyskocil v. VyskocilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. McCarthy v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Russell v. McOwen-HaneltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Parks v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Caccia v. CacciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ross v. Continental Resources, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  2. Scheuer v. MahoneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Neuwirth v. NeuwirthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  4. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. FedericoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Heritage Hill Fin. Co. v. Kinaeda Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API