Legal Opinion
Aase v. State, South Dakota Board of Regents
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1987No. 15246PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEEGE, Circuit Judge.
This is one of a series of actions brought to test the legality of closing the University of South Dakota at Springfield (USD/S) and the effect of such closing on various individuals.1 The plaintiffs in this action are students who attended USD/S during the academic year 1983-84. The defendants include the members of the South Dakota Board of Regents, individually and in their capacity as regents. The trial court granted these defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs appealed. We affirm.
In the spring of 1984 the South Dakota Legislature enacted Senate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Deuchar v. Foland Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Estate of Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Beukas v. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Ruegsegger v. Board of Regents of Western New Mexico UniversityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.