Legal Opinion

Cooley Corp. v. Champlain Valley Union High School District 15

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 20, 1984No. 83-150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnderwood, J.

Plaintiff, a general contractor, sued the defendant school district for a claimed balance due under a written contract. After a bench trial the Chittenden Superior Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Because the trial court failed to make a critical finding, we are compelled to reverse and remand.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract under which the former would improve and construct athletic fields at Champlain Valley Union High School. The contract documents included a bid request, specifications for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. VanVelsor v. DzewaltowskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  2. Jensen v. JensenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. Mayer v. MayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. Valsangiacomo v. Paige & Campbell, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Vermont National Bank v. Chittenden Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kopelman v. SchwagSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. Waterbury Feed Co., LLC v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. Waterbury Feed Company, LLC v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API