Legal Opinion

Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 18, 1947No. Civil Action No. 999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District judge.

This matter concerns a somewhat confusing set of interrelated motions concerning the litigation in this court and elsewhere. A statement of the underlying facts will be limited to those giving a reasonable understanding of the present controversy.

*44The defendant, Recordgraph, was organized in 1939 and became the owner of some fifteen United States Letters Patent. By agreement dated May 24, 1943, it entered into an exclusive license agreement concerning those patents with Amertype Rec■ordgraph Corporation, which subsequently merged with the plaintiff. Under this agreement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. General Electric Co. v. Refrigeration Patents Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946
  4. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. StaleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Musher Foundation, Inc. v. Alba Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Preas v. PhebusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  3. Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API