Peters v. De Rose Gracia
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento and from an order denying a new trial. A. P. Catlin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
There are four certain swamp land surveys in Sacramento county which are numbered, respectively, and extend in a continuous chain along the east bank of the Sacramento river from south to north, in the following order: 147, 165, 282, and 173. The tracts 147, 165, and 173 were surveyed in the year 1858, and tract 282 in 1859; all under the act of April 21, 1858, providing for the sale, etc., of swamp and overflowed lands. (Stats. 1858, p. 198.) By section 11 of that act surveys of lands held by actual settlers were required to conform to the lines and boundaries established by such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blackburn v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Irvine v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Quinn v. WindmillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Edwards v. TenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Ikola v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973