Legal Opinion

Weinberger Banana Co. v. Phœnix Assur. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1935No. 7484PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by the appellant on a policy of insurance issued by the appellee for the alleged value of 6,957 bunches of bananas the loss of which was alleged to have been occasioned directly and proximately by perils insured against by said policy, to wit, “hurricanes and/or floods, and/or accidents to the conveyance.” The allegations of appellant’s petition as to the loss of the bananas having been due to. perils insured against were put in issue by the appellee. The evidence introduced in the trial consisted of the insurance policy sued on and a stipulation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ripley v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. National Fire Ins. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Gatewood v. Continental General Life Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1927
  4. Ripley v. Railway Passengers Assur. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1870
  5. Dolge v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Velotta v. Western Fire InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Trinity Universal Insurance Company v. TubbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Semon v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1959
  4. Three Star Transportation, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
  5. United States v. Edwin B. Stimpson Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API