Legal Opinion

Ripley v. Railway Passengers Assur. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At law.

1Opinion of the Court

WITHEY, District Judge.

The Railway Passengers’ Assurance Company, of Hartford, Conn., issued to W. J. Ripley, May 18, 18G9, a policy or ticket of insurance, the terms of which are as follows: “The Railway Passengers’ Assurance Company, of Hartford, Connecticut, will indemnify the insured by this ticket, in the sum of twenty-five dollars per week, against loss of time, not exceeding twenty-six consecutive weeks, while totally disabled and prevented from all kinds of business, by reason of bodily injuries, effected from violent and accidental means, or will pay the sum of five thousand dollars…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southard v. Railway Passengers Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gatewood v. Continental General Life Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1927
  2. McCullough v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Weinberger Banana Co. v. Phœnix Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  4. Mills v. Colonial Penn InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 2000
  5. United States v. Edwin B. Stimpson Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API