Legal Opinion · Dissent

Spiers v. Consolidated Companies, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1960No. 4977; On Rehearing No. 5092Published

1DissentLandry, Judge

The conclusions herein reached by the majority on the question of proximate cause as relates to the defendant Consolidated Companies, Inc. and its insurer, the Travelers Insurance Co., and on the issue of causal relation between the herniaplasty performed upon plaintiff on October 27, 1956, and the subsequent myocardial infarction sustained by plaintiff compels me to dissent herein.

As I understand the majority opinion on the question of proximate cause, it holds the original opinion rendered herein was in error in concluding the engineer Thornton had the last clear chance to avoid the acci*818dent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Morgan City Canning Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Succession of FieldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  3. Owens v. FelderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API