Legal Opinion

Leo Dung Dye v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1930No. 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BANKS, J.

This is an action on an accident insurance policy. The insured, Harry Apau Dye, met his death on April 30,1929, by accidental drowning. The plaintiff in the action is Leo Dung Dye, the widow of the insured, and the sole beneficiary named in the policy. The jury returned a verdict against the defendant in the sum of $10,000. Judgment Avas rendered on the verdict in the sum of $10,706.67, the amount in excess of the verdict itself being on account of interest. The defendant brings the case to this court by Avrit of error. At the conclusion of the evidence the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Hardman v. Firemen's Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1884
  3. Mulville v. AdamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Genovia v. Jackson National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
  2. Park v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Reassure America Life Insurance v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. DecorionHawaii Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Vannatta v. Pacific Guardian Life InsuranceHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API