Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Ah Choy

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal prom District Magistrate oop Honolulu on Points op Law.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

The defendants were convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $5 each and $1.15 costs by the district magistrate of Honolulu upon a charge of violating an ordinance of the county of Oahu made by its board of supervisors against spraying clothes with liquid projected from the mouth.

*332The defendants appealed from the judgment upon points of law, viz.: “That said judgment is illegal and invalid because :•

1. That this Court has no jurisdiction of or concerning the charge entered against the defendants, or of the subject matter of said cause.

2. That said charge sets…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Natal v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. State v. . TaftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Territory v. Sing HighHawaii Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API