Legal Opinion

Ryan Co. v. Sanitary District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 1943No. Gen. No. 41,629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Assumpsit action tried by the court without a jury. On June 28, 1940, at the close of plaintiff’s case, a judgment for defendant was entered upon all of plaintiff’s claims but one. At the close of all of the evidence a second judgment was entered, on December 10, 1940, in favor of defendant as to the remaining claim.

The complaint contained five counts; also an additional count which was an amplification of count II. The claims under count III were settled prior to the trial and that count was dismissed in the first judgment order. That judgment order also determined plaintiff’s claims under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMaster v. . the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Underground Construction Co. v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Litchfield Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Kinser Construction Co. v. . State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Del Balso Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James A. Jackson, Trading as Jim Jackson v. Sam Finley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. J. F. Edwards Construction Co. v. Illinois State Toll Highway AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Unicon Management Corp. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. J. F. Edwards Construction Co. v. Illinois State Toll Highway AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. J. F. Edwards Construction Co. v. Illinois State Toll Highway AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API