Legal Opinion

Robert A. Reichard, Inc. v. Ezl. Dunwoody Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1942No. Civil Action 1070PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This is an action by a purchaser of cod liver oil against his vendor to recover damages for breach of warranty.

Plaintiff’s evidence showed that it was a manufacturer of and dealer in fertilizer and poultry feeds. On October 30, 1935, plaintiff purchased from the,defendant one. hundred thirty-gallon drums of cod liver oil imported by defendant from Norway. At the time plaintiff ordered this oil, defendant’s salesman orally warranted that it contained 150 units of Vitamin D per gram. This order was confirmed in writing by defendant the following day.

Plaintiff subsequently…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wolstenholme, Inc. v. Jos. Randall Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Buckbee v. P. Hohenadel, Jr., Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  3. Aldridge Motors, Inc. v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Griffin v. Metal Product Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Carleton v. Lombard, Ayres & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nepera Chemical, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Griffin v. BredouwSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Holland v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Gaede v. StansberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API