United States v. Heinze
District Court, S.D. New York
On Demurrer to Indictment under Rev. St. § 5208, Act July 12, 1882, c. 290, § 13, 22 Stat. 166 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497), and section 5209 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497), and on Motion to Quash.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
1. The first 15 counts are said to be had for duplicity, in that they state two distinct offenses, each requiring different proof to establish it, viz.: (1) An offense under section 5203 (U. S. Comp. St. 15)01, p. 3497); i. e., the certification of a check when the drawer has not on deposit with the bank “an amount of money equal to the amount specified in such check.” (2) An offense under Act July 12, 1882, c. 290, § 13, 22 Stat. 166 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497); i. e., the certification of a check “before the amount thereof shall have been regularly entered to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Potter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Batchelor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- United States v. PotterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1892
- Rieger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Travis Leon Wilson, Orrin Shaid, Jr., Louis Levin, Jerald Aaron White, Jasonn. Winthrop and David Levi WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- United States v. MorseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1908
- Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. McKayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.