Legal Opinion
Austin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1927No. 4992PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted under an indictment which, under section 126 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10296), charged him in two counts with subornation of perjury in the execution of certain supersedeas bonds. For the reversal of the judgment he contends, first, that the indictment failed to allege that the persons who were suborned knew at the time when they were suborned, or at the time of giving their testimony, that they were committing the crime of perjury.
The indictment, however, charged in the first count that the plaintiff in error willfully,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Miner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Boren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Catrino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- William Estep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Boyd v. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Johnston v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.