Carpenter v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This case presents but a single issue: whether the Federal Railroad Safety Act and the Highway Safety Act preempt state law over negligence suits alleging a failure to maintain adequate grade crossing warning devices. Based upon the United States Supreme Court’s decision in CSX Transp., Inc. v. Easterwood (1993), 507 U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1732, 123 L.Ed.2d 387, and our own interpretation of the legislation at issue, we find no preemption and therefore affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
We recently addressed the preemptive effect of the Federal Railroad Safety Act in the context of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Matkovich v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- In re Miamisburg Train Derailment LitigationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Linda Thiele, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Craig Thiele v. Norfolk & Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Freeman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.