Legal Opinion

DeArman v. Popps

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1965No. 7498PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAVEZ, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Tommy Popps and Sunset International Petroleum Corporation. The complaint against defendants, Dowell, Inc. and Dow Chemical Co., was dismissed and they are not involved in this appeal.

Plaintiff DeArman was an employee of Lawrence Drilling Company, hereinafter referred to as “Lawrence,” and plaintiff Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, hereinafter referred to as “Indemnity,” had issued to Lawrence a workmen’s compensation insurance policy. By reason of this policy and the injuries…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wolczak v. National Electric Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Coca v. ArceoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Burruss v. B. M. C. Logging Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bergquist v. PentermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Shipman v. MacCo CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Leo Parsons v. Amerada Hess Corporation v. B & M Service Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. MontanezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hobbs v. Mobil Oil CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Gray v. Baker & Taylor Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Harger v. Structural Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API