Legal Opinion
Chicopee Mfg. Co. v. Public Service Company of New Hampshire
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 6, 1953No. 4141PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
1. Reproduction Cost Evidence. In the opening statement on behalf of the company the following offer of proof was made: “In previous hearings the net investment rate base theory has been the only theory advanced or employed. The Company will present evidence to permit such a rate base determination and will point out in connection therewith that this least favorable method of approach justifies the proposed rates because they will produce revenues which are no more than just or reasonable. However, the net investment rate base is not the only approach to the determination of the right…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- City of Alton v. Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Boone County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Legislative Utility Consumers' Council v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.